• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Contact Us
  • Sponsor An Email
  • Post A Job
  • Merger & Acquisition Services

Agency Checklists

Massachusetts Insurance News & Job Opportunities

You are here: Home / Latest News / In A Not-Really But Supposedly Coverage Decision, SJC Holds That Police Officer Driving Recklessly For Fun Not Covered By Massachusetts Torts Claim Act

In A Not-Really But Supposedly Coverage Decision, SJC Holds That Police Officer Driving Recklessly For Fun Not Covered By Massachusetts Torts Claim Act

November 29, 2021 by Nina Kallen

Agency Checklists MA Insurance News Mass Insurance News


In Berry v. Commerce Insurance Company, 175 N.E.3d 383 (Mass. 2021), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that a police officer who recklessly drove his vehicle into a fellow officer during a training day was not protected by the Massachusetts Torts Claim Act, even though the injured officer received workers compensation for the accident.

Why does a discussion of this case appear in an insurance coverage blog?  Because the SJC characterized the issue as one of coverage rather than liability.

Both officers were attending a full day weapons training, which included a paid lunch break. Shawn Sheehan drove his pickup truck to buy lunch. Returning, he stopped his truck and then sped up, heading towards a picnic table where Russell Berry sat. Sheehan applied the brakes. The truck slid and struck Berry. For his misconduct Sheehan was suspended for five days without pay. 

Berry received compensation under the workers compensation statute applicable to police officers injured in the performance of their duty.  

Berry submitted his third-party claim against Sheehan to Commerce, which insured Sheehan’s pickup truck. According to the SJC, Commerce denied coverage on the ground that Sheehan was a public employee acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident, and thus was immune from liability under the Massachusetts Torts Claim Act. Berry sued Commerce, seeking a judgment declaring that Sheehan was not immune under the act.  

As I told Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, here, I suspect that this was a misstatement.  Commerce is unlikely to have denied insurance coverage on the basis of the MTCA.  Rather, the MTCA is a defense to liability.  In other words, Commerce was mostly likely defending Sheehan, and arguing that he was immune under the MTCA was part of that defense.  

If I am correct, Berry could have sued Sheehan directly, with Commerce defending. If he had done so, the parties might have had to have gone through extensive discovery with respect to Berry’s injuries and other issues, before the court would rule on the applicability of the MTCA. I speculate that Berry did an end-run around this by suing Commerce in a declaratory judgment action, seeking a (hopefully quicker) decision on the limited issue of the applicability of the MTCA.  With that issue determined in Berry’s favor, the parties are much likelier to be able to settle without more extensive litigation. 

The pure coverage issue discussed in this decision (although it had already been determined) is Berry’s eligibility for worker’s compensation. The court noted a seeming contradiction between Berry being found to have been injured in the performance of his duty for worker’s compensation purposes, but Sheehan being found to not have been acting within the scope of his employment under the MTCA.

There really is no contradiction. The workers compensation statute is broadly interpreted to find coverage for employees, including generally when they are victims of torts related to their job – regardless of the motivation of the tortfeasor. The MTCA protects against liability for some torts that are committed in connection with an employee’s work but not does not protect against liability for other torts. The court held that Sheehan’s unsafe driving was not within the scope of his employment because it was not motivated, even in part, by a purpose to serve his employer. That does not mean that Berry is not entitled to worker’s compensation, because he was a victim of that tort while on the job.  

Nina Kallen of Insurance Coverage Issues in Massachusetts

Nina Kallen

Attorney at Law

Nina Kallen is a Massachusetts attorney with over 25 years of experience and is the founder of the Insurance Coverage Massachusetts law blog. She specializes in insurance coverage and bad faith cases. She also drafts briefs for other attorneys in all areas of civil litigation. Connect with her on LinkedIn or through her blog via the links below:

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    Filed Under: Latest News, MA Insurance Law | Insurance Coverage Cases Tagged With: Agency Checklists, insurance coverage, insurance coverage lawsuits Massachusetts, Mass. Insurance News, massachusetts insurance news, New England Insurance News, nina kallen

    Primary Sidebar

    Sponsored

    Sponsored

    MA Division of Insurance Announcements

    Latest Agency Sales

    Salem Five Insurance Acquires Cavanaugh Insurance Agency

    Insurance Agency Mergers & Acquisitions in Massachusetts | Q3-2022

    More Agency Sales

    Career News

    Michael Percy Appointed To Concord Group Board of Directors

    Michael Percy Appointed To Concord Group Board of Directors

    Layoffs At Two Boston-Based Insurtechs

    Layoffs At Two Boston-Based Insurtechs

    Massachusetts insurance news, MA Insurance News, Mass. Commissioner of Insurance Gary Anderson, NAIC 2019 Appointments

    NAIC Names Its 2023 Committee Leadership

    View More Career News

    In Memoriam

    In Memoriam: Nancy L. Perocchi, 1937-2022

    In Memoriam: Peter J. Nobile, Jr., 1931-2022

    In Memoriam: Nancy Jane A. Vajcovec, 1947-2022 | Agency Checklists

    In Memoriam: Nancy Jane A. Vajcovec, 1947-2022

    CAR News

    Outgoing Gov Baker Signs Catalytic Converter Bill on Way Out

    Road Safety Analysts Put Mass. In “Danger” Zone

    Final Look 2022: The Massachusetts Private Passenger Auto Insurance Marketplace

    View More CAR News

    Massachusetts Law Updates

    Insured’s $2 Million Claim For Loss Prevention Costs Scuttled By The Supreme Judicial Court

    A look at the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts’ ruling on Ken’s Foods’ common law reimbursement claim.

    An Insured’s Underpayment of Loss Lawsuit Over Brookline Building Backfires

    The Appeals Court recently affirmed a decision in Anwar Faisal et al. v. United National Insurance Company that reminds one of the saying, “Be careful what you ask for. You may get it.” In this case, the insured sued to get more money on a property damage claim, asking the court to rule on his […]

    Failed Foray Into Massachusetts Ends In A Lawsuit For New York Agency Over Its Producer’s Understanding of Salary v. Draw

    A case in point about what can go wrong when an agency, its officers, and a producer being onboarded, come to loggerheads and litigation ensues.

    Harvard College Sues Zurich to Overturn A Late Notice Denial of A $15 Million Policy Claim

    Late Policy Notice to Zurich Leads To Harvard’s Loss of $15 Million in Coverage

    Summary Judgement for Zurich effectively dismissed Harvard’s lawsuit by The Court.

    More Mass. Law Updates

    DOI News

    Facts & Figures For New England Insurance Departments & Insurance Producers | 2023

    Massachusetts Insurance Commissioner Honored for Exceptional Leadership

    DOI: Insurance Companies Must Renew MA Appointments by October 14th

    The 2022 Home Insurance Report Part III | Policy Numbers by Massachusetts County

    View More DOI News

    Insurance Fraud

    Walmart Will Pay $500k For Its Failure To Follow Workers’ Comp. Prescription Pricing Procedures

    Former Insurance Adjuster Indicted in Connection with Stealing Identities of Four Victims of Merrimack Valley Gas Explosions

    Phony Pumpkin Assault Claim Gets 3 Years For Insurance Fraud

    Edgartown Masonry Company Owner Indicted for Workers’ Compensation Fraud

    More Insurance Fraud News

    Footer

    Agency Checklists

    Contact us

    14 Summer Street
    Suite 102
    Malden, MA 02148
    617-598-3800

    Advertise on Agency Checklists

    We offer a variety of ways to get help promote your company or product.

    Announcements
    Email Sponsorships
    Partnerships
    Custom Collaborations

    *Affiliate Disclosure

    Please note that any of Agency Checklists’ articles might contain one or more affiliate links. This means that any subsequent purchase resulting from these links may result in a commission for us, but at no additional cost to you. For example, as an Amazon Associate, Agency Checklists earns a commission from all qualifying purchases. By working with affiliates we can continue to keep Agency Checklists subscription free. Thank you for your support.

    SEARCH OUR SITE

    Explore Our Archives

    Copyright © 2023 · Agency Checklists · All rights reserved.

     

    Loading Comments...