• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Sign Up
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
    • Monthly Banner Ad
    • Sponsor An Email
    • Post A Job
    • Product Launch

Agency Checklists

Massachusetts-inspired Insurance News & More

  • JOBS
  • Checklists
    • Starting Your Own Massachusetts Insurance Agency
    • Purchasing An Insurance Agency in Massachusetts
    • Why, When, & How: Times When A Massachusetts Insurance Agent Should Use A Business Broker
    • Deciding Whether or Not to Outsource Your Customer Service?
    • Employment Contracts & The Non-Compete Clause In Massachusetts
    • Hiring An Insurance Producer In Massachusetts
    • Insurance Agent to Agency Loans In Massachusetts
    • Moving Your Massachusetts Insurance Agency
    • How Premium Financing Can Work For Your Massachusetts Insurance Agency
    • Remuneration Audit Checklist
    • Selling Your Massachusetts Insurance Agency
    • Applying For An Agency Loan
    • When The Auditor Calls
  • Data
  • Events
  • InsurShop
    • Insurance Quiz Time
    • Insurance Books
      • Innovation Titles
      • Improvement
      • Leadership
      • Licensing
      • Marketing
      • Sales
    • Insurance Films
    • Insurance Glossary
  • Partner News
You are here: Home / Insurance News | Massachusetts / DOI News | Massachusetts Division of Insurance / Division of Insurance Issues Consumer Alert On Ride-Sharing And Car-Sharing Apps

Division of Insurance Issues Consumer Alert On Ride-Sharing And Car-Sharing Apps

July 22, 2014 by Owen Gallagher

The Division of Insurance has issued a consumer alert for consumers who either let someone else drive their car for a fee (car-sharing) or who use their vehicle to transport another rider for a fee (car-sharing).

The alert results from the proliferation of companies such as Uber, RelayRides, Lyft, FlightCar, and Zimride that provide smartphone app-based services to match individuals who want to earn money by renting their personal autos to other drivers or individuals who want to chauffeur riders in their personal auto for a fee.

The Division’s warning to consumers who use their personal auto for such car-sharing and ride-sharing is clear and unequivocal:

….all insurers in Massachusetts will deny coverage should an incident occur if you use your vehicle to provide rides to strangers for a fee or other economic inducement.

A link to alert is at the bottom of this article.

Alert focuses on coverage risk to consumers engaged in ride-sharing programs.

The division directed its alert to three specific classes of consumers that have a coverage risk under these programs: (1) persons who own a vehicle and make it available for a car-sharing program; (2) persons who may rent a vehicle through a car-sharing program; and (3) persons who drive passengers for a fee.
Some of the points made to consumers in the division’s alert are:

  • Most Massachusetts insurers will not consider using your vehicle for a car-sharing service “permissible use,” and are unlikely to cover claims arising from such use.
  • An insurance policy is a contractual agreement, and all insurers in Massachusetts will deny coverage should an incident occur if you use your vehicle to provide rides to strangers for a fee or other economic inducement.
  • Most insurers in Massachusetts will also exclude coverage when you “rent” your car to another driver through a car-sharing service.
  • If you participate in a car-sharing service, your insurance policy may be non-renewed if your vehicle is involved in an accident while being used in this manner.
  • Car-sharing companies may offer insurance coverage, but probably with limitations and exclusions.
  • If your liability in an accident exceeds a car-sharing company’s coverage limit, you could be liable for the remaining cost of the damages or the medical care required by the injured party or parties.
  • If you are renting a “car-sharing” vehicle, you may not be insured for that vehicle unless the car-sharing service provides coverage.
  • If you, as the renter, get into an accident, you may have to pay out-of-pocket for injuries or damage to the rented car which result.
  • And if the car-sharing service’s insurance coverage limit is lower than the cost of all damages—a situation which could occur if there are multiple passengers who are all badly hurt in an accident—you may be personally liable for those costs as well.

Supreme Judicial Court decision on car-sharing and ride-sharing programs exclusion

Agents or companies advising insureds trying to make money through ride-sharing or car-sharing programs should be familiar with the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court in the case of Lodge v. Bern, 328 Mass. 42 (1951) as well as the Automobile Insurers Bureau’s endorsement on personal vehicle sharing programs.

The standard automobile policy has always contained a provision excluding optional coverages “while the motor vehicle is used as a public or livery conveyance” The present form of this exclusion applies to property damage and all optional coverages and reads the same except that the words “motor vehicle” now reads “your auto.”

In the Lodge case, a person rented a vehicle from precursor of the present car-sharing programs before there were smart phone apps. The company provided a vehicle insured for personal use to a third-party for a fee.

The driver who rented the personal auto through a ‘rental system’ caused an accident that resulted in bodily injury to a third person. The injured person recovered a judgment in excess of the compulsory coverage limit of $5,000. The insurer contested liability for any amount over the $5,000 basic limit based on the ‘public or livery conveyance’ exclusion.

The Supreme Judicial Court found for the insurer and denied recovery of the optional bodily injury limit, leaving the owner and renter of the vehicle personally liable for the judgment in excess of the compulsory limit.

While the ‘public or livery conveyance’ exclusion clearly applies by its terms to any personal auto that is used for fee-based ride-sharing programs, the Lodge case, which is still good law today, extends the exclusion to car-sharing programs as well.

If there were any doubt, however, a recently approved endorsement applicable to the Massachusetts automobile insurance policy states:

We will not pay any claim for injury or property damage under the policy, while your auto is being used in a personal vehicle sharing program. Such programs or the use of your auto by a person other than you or a household member under an agreement and with payment to you. This exclusion does not apply to personal injury protection.

(See also Agency Checklists’ prior article “New Endorsement Makes It Clear: No Coverage For Personal Vehicle Used In Ridesharing Program“)

Anyone advising insureds about their using personal automobiles in car-sharing or ride-sharing programs should focus on the personal lines auto policy’s ‘public or livery conveyance’ exclusion, the Lodge case, and the ‘personal vehicle sharing program’ endorsement. Each of these can exclude optional coverages for personal vehicles involved in accidents while being used in these programs.

Advising insureds about the coverage issues in the division’s alert

The best advice to insureds about insurance coverage for any  arrangement where they loan their personal vehicle to other people for compensation or where they use their personal vehicle transporting passengers for hire may be that the insured should expect that the only coverage available will be what coverage the car-sharing or ride-sharing program they plan to use may provide, if any.

The Division of Insurance consumer alert is here: Consumer Alert – Car-sharing & ride-sharing. Please feel free to download, print out, add to a website or to send the link to insureds.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: DOI News | Massachusetts Division of Insurance Tagged With: mass insurance news, Mass. Insurance News

About Owen Gallagher

Owen Gallagher is an experienced insurance litigator as well as a certified mediator and arbitrator who specializes in insurance industry disputes. His interest and affinity for insurance began at a young age working the counter at his father’s assigned risk agency in Roxbury. Over the course of his career, Owen has argued a number of cases in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and has helped agents, insurance companies, and lawmakers alike with the complexities and idiosyncrasies of insurance law in the Commonwealth.  Owen can be reached here.

Primary Sidebar

See Who’s Hiring On the AC Job Board

Sponsored Checklist

When Why & How To Use A Business Broker in Massachusetts

Sponsored

Career News

Acrisure Names Matthew Marolda as Chief Innovation Officer

Renaissance Alliance's Michael Cormier

Michael Cormier Named Chief Revenue Officer

Merchants Insurance Robert Zak

Robert M. Zak Appointed Board Chair of Merchants Insurance Group

Plymouth Rock Strengthens Marketing Team with Two New Appointments

Risman Insurance Agencies Hires Monica Adwani As Director of Marketing & Sales

Risman Insurance Agencies Hires Monica Adwani As Director of Marketing & Sales

Latest Agency Sales

Massachusetts insurance agency Partners Insurance Group

Partners Insurance Group Purchases The Interstate Insurance & Finance Company

Boston-based Risk Strategies

Risk Strategies Acquires Specialty Insurance Solutions

AssuredPartners Northeast acquires The Glynn Agency

AssuredPartners Acquires The Joseph A. Glynn Insurance Agency

Compass Planners Joins Forces With The Hilb Group

Compass Planners Joins Forces With The Hilb Group

More Agency Sales

Comments & Updates

  • Khalid on February Mass. Home Sales Hit 17-Year High
  • Robert on Marie Rose of Kaplansky Insurance Earns CPIA Designation
  • Michael Powers on Tips to Help Insureds Avoid Auto Repair Shop Fraud
  • Jim Steere on Tips to Help Insureds Avoid Auto Repair Shop Fraud
  • Tony Lucacio on Associate General Counsel For Goosehead Insurance Terminated After Participating In January 6th Events In Washington, D.C.

AC In Your Inbox

Massachusetts Law Updates

Mass. Court Bars Suit Seeking Plymouth Rock To Pay Title, Registration, And Inspection Fees On Total Losses

A class action complaint against Plymouth Rock sought a ruling on regulatory costs for first-party total loss claims.

Mass. Appeals Court Reverses $4 Million Defense Verdict Over Judge Advising Jury About Insurance

Massachusetts, as opposed to many states, allows insurance companies to pursue subrogation in the name of the insured rather than in the name of the insurance company. This case is one such example.

Tips to Help Insureds Avoid Auto Repair Shop Fraud: Part 2

Beware of written waivers!

How many automobile insureds receive renewal questionnaires that they do not return to their insurers? Quite a few, since many of the questionnaires, stated something to the effect that “if there are no changes to the information on the questionnaire, the insured does not have to return it.”

Failure To Return Auto-Renewal Questionnaire Results In Coverage Denial In Lamborghini Collision Lawsuit Due To Insurer’s “Snowbird Clause”

A First Circuit Court of Appeals found that the failure to return a renewal questionnaire with updated information resulted in two Massachusetts insureds losing their optional collision and liability coverage and umbrella coverage in a Naples, Florida collision involving their Toyota Highlander and a $100,000 Lamborghini.

More Mass. Law Updates

CAR News

MA Gas Prices: Another Week Another Increase At The Pump

1st Update 2021: The MA Private Passenger Auto Insurance Marketplace

1st Update 2021: The Commonwealth’s Commercial Auto Insurance Marketplace

Tips to Help Insureds Avoid Auto Repair Shop Fraud

View More CAR News

DOI News

Division Expects Mass. Auto Carriers To Submit New Rates By June 30

Massachusetts Insurance Commissioner Leads Insurance Standard-Setting

Mass AGO Continues Push For Auto Insurance Premium Reductions

DOI To Hold Hearing On CAR Proposed Performance Standards

View More DOI News

Insurance Fraud

Auto Body Shop Owner Sentenced For Tax Fraud

Acton Agent Sentence To 8.5 Years For Stealing $3.8 Million From Clients

Peabody Contractor Indicted For Insurance Fraud And Payroll Tax Evasion On $2.5 Million Of Under-The-Table Wages

Massachusetts Shares in $39.5 Million Multistate Settlement Agreement Over Insurance Company Data Breach

More Insurance Fraud News

Footer

Agency Checklists

About us
Contact us

14 Summer Street
Suite 102
Malden, MA 02148
617-598-3800
info@agencychecklists.com

Advertise on Agency Checklists

We offer a variety of ways to get help promote your company or product.

Announcements
Email Sponsorships
Partnerships
Custom Collaborations

*Affiliate Disclosure

Please note that any of Agency Checklists’ articles might contain one or more affiliate links. This means that any subsequent purchase resulting from these links may result in a commission for us, but at no additional cost to you. For example, as an Amazon Associate, Agency Checklists earns a commission from all qualifying purchases. By working with affiliates we can continue to keep Agency Checklists subscription free. Thank you for your support.

SEARCH OUR SITE

Explore Our Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Agency Checklists · All rights reserved.