• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Contact Us
  • Sponsor An Email
  • Post A Job
  • Merger & Acquisition Services

Agency Checklists

Massachusetts Insurance News & Job Opportunities

You are here: Home / Insurance Law | Massachusetts / MA Insurance Law | Insurance Coverage Cases / The Most Important Point You Need To Know About The New Federal Trade Secrets Act

The Most Important Point You Need To Know About The New Federal Trade Secrets Act

May 17, 2016 by Owen Gallagher

Agency Checklists, MA Insurance News, Mass. Insurance NewsOn May 11, 2016 President Obama signed the “The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016” (“DTSA”). The bill that the President signed had broad bipartisan support, passing the House of Representative with a vote or of 410 in favor and two against and the Senate by a unanimous vote.

Before the enactment of DTSA, statutes regulating trade secrets were exclusively a matter for the states. Forty-eight out of the fifty states had passed the Uniform Trade Secrets Act as part of their state law. Massachusetts, however, was one of two states, along with New York, that failed to adopt the Uniform Trade Secrets Act.

With the enactment of DTSA, all forms of intellectual property: patents; trademarks; copyrights; and trade secrets now have federal statutes protecting their ownership through federal civil jurisdiction. However, DTSA does not preempt any state trade secret laws but instead adds a federal right to enforce trade secret agreements in addition to any existing state trade secret law.

DTSA gives right to bring federal civil action for breach of trade secret agreement

The most important result of the passage of DTSA is the creation of a right for businesses or organizations to file legal actions against any other person who has misappropriated or illegally received trade secrets in federal court. Under DTSA, “An owner of trade secret that is misappropriated may bring a civil action [in federal court] if the trade secret is related to a product of service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce.”

Broad federal definition of trade secrets protectable under DTSA

Under the statutory definition applicable to the DTSA, a “trade secret” means:

  • all forms and types of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information, including patterns, plans, compilations, program devices, formulas, designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures, programs, or codes,
  • whether tangible or intangible, and whether or how stored, compiled, or memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, photographically, or in writing…

In order to be a protectable trade secret under federal law, however, the owner of the trade secret must have “taken reasonable measures to keep such information secret” and the information that the owner claims as a trade secret must be information that has actual or potential independent economic value, “…from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by the public.”

In short, any information on which a business can make money by keeping that information from falling into a competitor’s hands or the public domain, is a possible protectable trade secret.

DTSA has a broad definition of “Misappropriation” of trade secrets, double damages and recovery of attorney feesAgency Checklists, MA Insurance News, Mass. Insurance News

The Act provides a definition of “Misappropriation” that includes:

(A.) Acquisition of trade secret by person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was required by improper means or;

(B.) Disclosure or use of a trade secret of another without …consent by a person who used improper means to acquire knowledge of the trade secret and… knew or had reason to know the knowledge of the trade secret was [obtained by a breach of someone’s contractual duty].

In the ordinary course, the requirement for a duty of confidentiality between the owner of the trade secret and another person to exist, there must be a clear and unequivocal duty to maintain the secrecy of the information. In almost all cases, this duty results from a written confidentiality agreement identify the trade secrets to be protected.

Also, the act allows for injunctions to “to prevent any actual or threatened misappropriation,”  “damages for actual loss caused by the misappropriation of the trade secret,” “damages for any unjust enrichment caused by the misappropriation of the trade secret that is not addressed in computing damages for actual loss,” and “if the trade secret is willfully and maliciously misappropriated, award exemplary damages in an amount not more than two times the amount of the damages awarded [and] attorney fees to the prevailing party.”

DTSA gives federal court power to order federal law enforcement officers to seize misappropriated trade secrets

DTSA provides a new remedy that allows federal judges to order without any notice the civil seizure of property by federal law enforcement officers.

Under DTSA the owner or licensee of the misappropriated trade secrets may petition United States District Court to issue an order directing that federal law enforcement officials seize property, when necessary, to protect trade secrets that have been improperly acquired.

While such an order would provide an extremely powerful remedy to the trade secret owner, the law does not give the owner obtaining such an order an easy task. The petitioner must convince a federal judge that eight separate conditions apply including, among others that: (2) if the order does not issue, the petitioner will suffer irreparable harm; (5) the target possesses the trade secret and the property to be seized; (7) the target would destroy the property if the applicant proceeded with notice; and (8) the applicant has not publicized the requested seizure.

DTSA effective date and definition of employee

The provisions of the new Federal Trade Secrets Act apply, “With respect to any misappropriation of a trade secret…for which any act occurs on or after the date of the enactment of this act [May 11, 2016].”[pullquote]A 2009 survey found that employers can expect that 60% of all departing employees will download and take the company’s data with them without authorization[/pullquote]

Under the Act an “employee” is defined as including “Any individual performing work as a contractor or consultant for an employer as well as what would be considered an employee under common law.”

The new and important condition required by DTSA for existing and future trade secret agreement

Federal jurisdiction, double damages, and attorney fees for enforcing breaches of trade secret confidentiality puts some real legal teeth into a trade secret agreement. There is a catch, however.

Congress, possibly concerned about trade secret confidentiality agreements being misused to threaten or throttle whistleblowers, put a provision in DTSA to provide immunity to whistleblowers who disclose confidential information to a state or the Federal Government solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of the law.

Under DTSA, if an employer does not put a notice as to whistleblower immunity in any contract or agreement that governs the use of a trade secret or other confidential information by an employee, independent contractor, or consultant, the employer loses the right to recover double damages or attorney fees.

The notice requirement may be met by putting the notice in the trade secret agreement, or by clearly cross-referencing a policy document that describes the company’s reporting policy for a suspected violation of the law. This requirement applies to any confidentiality agreement entered into on or after May 12, 2016.

For companies that want the maximum protection allowed by law, this notice change requires a review of any existing trade secret agreements or agreements in the future to comply with this new requirement.

Agency and company takeaway: use trade secret agreements

With the addition of a federal cause of action to protect trade secrets, any agency or insurance-related business should amend its trade secret agreements and computer access agreements to comply with the notice provisions of the new act to maintain the statute’s right to enhanced damages and attorney fees if a signatory to such company’s agreement divulges protected trade secrets.

Within any given agency or company there obviously exists the expiration and marketing information. Additionally, many companies have specific marketing techniques or business methods, including program plans, that a trade secret agreement can protect.

The effort and cost to have a comprehensive trade secret agreement prepared and signed by employees, contractors, and consultants is relatively minimal compared to the costs and losses that such an agreement can prevent or minimize.

The above definition is inducement of a breach of a duty to maintain secrecy, which means its the requirement that the agency or company have clear information concerning protective trade secrets through clearly written contractual obligations.

Company Trade SecretsWhy you need employees, contractors and consultants to sign trade secret agreements

An agency or company may be questioning whether trade secret agreements are really necessary. To that end, it might be worthwhile to consider a 2009 survey conducted by the Ponemon Institute, a data protection research group.

The 2009 survey found that employers can expect that 60% of all departing employees will download and take the company’s data with them without authorization. The survey found that the confidential data taken usually consisted of email lists, competitive business information, customer lists, employee records, and company financial information.

A 2013 follow-up study by the same Institute found that the ubiquity of employees bringing their own devices (laptops, jump drives, etc.) into the workplace exacerbated the problem of insiders purloining customer data and trade secrets before leaving a company’s employ. Oftentimes the greatest risk in these situations came from the employees or independent contractors who the company allowed access to critical applications and data.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: MA Insurance Law | Insurance Coverage Cases Tagged With: ma insurance news, Mass. Insurance News

About Owen Gallagher

Owen Gallagher is an experienced insurance litigator as well as a certified mediator and arbitrator who specializes in insurance industry disputes. His interest and affinity for insurance began at a young age working the counter at his father’s assigned risk agency in Roxbury. Over the course of his career, Owen has argued a number of cases in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and has helped agents, insurance companies, and lawmakers alike with the complexities and idiosyncrasies of insurance law in the Commonwealth.  Owen can be reached here.

Primary Sidebar

Massachusetts Division of Insurance Announcement

Sponsored

Latest Agency Sales

Gallagher Snaps Up Eastern In Sale Worth 5-Times Commissions

Salem Five Insurance Acquires Philbin Insurance Group

Salem Five Insurance Acquires Philbin Insurance Group

More Agency Sales

Career News

Fred C. Church Hires Accomplished Higher Education Risk Management Professional Damual Greaves As Client Executive, Commercial Lines

New Hampshire Insurance Department Announces Confirmation of DJ Bettencourt as Insurance Commissioner

New Hampshire Insurance Department Announces Confirmation of DJ Bettencourt as Insurance Commissioner

NAIC Now Accepting Applications for 2024 Consumer Representatives

Boston Bruins Defenseman Hampus Lindholm Joins Plymouth Rock Assurance as Brand Ambassador for 2023-24 NHL Season

Boston Bruins Defenseman Hampus Lindholm Joins Plymouth Rock Assurance as Brand Ambassador for 2023-24 NHL Season 

Charles Symington Becomes Big ‘I’ President & CEO

The Hanover Appoints Stephanie E. Seibold and Arthur J. Barrett to Key Specialty Leadership Roles

Michelle Raue, SVP & Chief Claims Officer for Preferred Mutual Insurance Company Appointed to Rise Advisory Board of Directors

Fred C. Church Announces Key Personnel Changes to its Education Team

Kaplansky Insurance Appoints Peter Kenyon as Chief Acquisition Officer

The Hanover Appoints Charles F. Hamann to President of Small Commercial

View More Career News

In Memoriam

Robert J. Barnat

In Memoriam: Robert J. Barnat, 1946-2023

In Memoriam: Bernard Gitlin

In Memoriam: Pauline R. Gifford, 1936-2023

CAR News

DOI Approves CAR’s Changes in Massachusetts Auto Insurance Claims Handling

3rd Look At The 2023 Commercial Auto Marketplace in Massachusetts

Ballot Law Campaign Opposes Industry-Backed Auto Repair Agreement

View More CAR News

Massachusetts Law Updates

Claims-Made Policy Snares Another: Preservation Trust Loses Coverage For Late Notice

Strict Construction of Claims-Made Policy Strikes Again

Agency Checklists, MA Insurance News, Mass. Insurance News

Appeal Denied: Allstate Agents’ Wrongful Termination Claim Falls Flat

A case involving two former Allstate agents allegedly misusing confidential customer data after their termination.

Harvard College Sues Zurich to Overturn A Late Notice Denial of A $15 Million Policy Claim

The Pitfall of Late Notice: Harvard’s $15 Million Coverage Loss

The lawsuit over Harvard’s admission policies discriminating against Asian-American applicants.

Agency Checklists, MA Insurance News, Mass. Insurance News, GEICO, Largest Auto Insurance Cos. in Massachusetts

GEICO Faces Legal Battle as Captive Agent’s Lawsuit Advances

A Captive Agent’s Suit Against GEICO Can Proceed on Claims of Breach of Contract, Renewal Commissions Owed, Unjust Enrichment, and Employee Misclassification

More Mass. Law Updates

DOI News

Home Insurance Report Part III: Policies by Massachusetts County

MA Homeowners’ Insurance Premiums Topped $2.8B in 2021

Massachusetts Remains The 14th Largest Insurance Marketplace As Ranked By Total Premium Volume

Facts & Figures For New England Insurance Departments & Insurance Producers | 2023

View More DOI News

Insurance Fraud

Prison For A Year-And-A-Day in $14 Million Payroll Tax and Insurance Fraud Case

Greed & Betrayal: 67-year-old Advisor Gets 4 Years For Annuity Thefts From Vulnerable Clients

Physical Therapy Assistant Sentenced in Massachusetts Auto No-Fault Insurance Fraud Scheme

Surprising Survey Results Show Many Americans Think Insurance Fraud Is Not A Crime

More Insurance Fraud News

Footer

Agency Checklists

Contact us

Advertise on Agency Checklists

We offer a variety of ways to get help promote your company or product.

Announcements
Email Sponsorships
Partnerships
Custom Collaborations

*Affiliate Disclosure

Please note that any of Agency Checklists’ articles might contain one or more affiliate links. This means that any subsequent purchase resulting from these links may result in a commission for us, but at no additional cost to you. For example, as an Amazon Associate, Agency Checklists earns a commission from all qualifying purchases. By working with affiliates we can continue to keep Agency Checklists subscription free. Thank you for your support.

SEARCH OUR SITE

Explore Our Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Agency Checklists · All rights reserved.

 

Loading Comments...