• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Contact Us
  • Sponsor An Email
  • Post A Job
  • Merger & Acquisition Services

Agency Checklists

Massachusetts Insurance News & Job Opportunities

You are here: Home / Insurance News | Massachusetts / Insurers | News / Will Massachusetts Insurers Be Next To Deal With Crumbling Foundation Claims?

Will Massachusetts Insurers Be Next To Deal With Crumbling Foundation Claims?

December 18, 2018 by Owen Gallagher

Today, December 18, 2018, the Connecticut Supreme Court will hear arguments of three suits over whether homeowner policies provide coverage for crumbling foundations caused concrete containing pyrrhotite, an iron sulfide that has reacted naturally with oxygen and water over the decades.

While homeowners have filed claims under the homeowner insurance, carriers have denied the claims and successfully defended a number of lawsuits. However, one federal judge certified a question from a crumbling foundation policy suit to the Connecticut Supreme Court over what constitutes a “collapse” under a homeowner policy.

One insurer that has stepped forward to provide some grant assistance to its customers is the Travelers. On December 6, 2018, Travelers established the Travelers Benefit Program—a $5 million fund to assist customers in repairing homes with crumbling foundations in northeast Connecticut.

Over 35,000 homes in Connecticut and Massachusetts affected

The best estimates have almost 35,000 homes built between 1983 and 2016 that had foundations poured with concrete mined from a quarry in Willington, Connecticut. The quarry the company used had high concentrations of pyrrhotite.

The pyrrhotite from this quarry was part of the aggregate used for the cement being delivered for residential construction in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Over the course of fifteen to twenty years, the pyrrhotite can react with the seepage of water and oxygen by expanding. For house foundations with this concrete, cracks develop that eventually could lead to the failure of the foundation.

Once the pyrrhotite cracking begins, homeowners face the problem of replacing the foundation at costs that range up to $250,000.

Not just a Connecticut problem since the quarry delivered cement to Massachusetts

While the company mining the pyrrhotite delivered most of its concrete for Connecticut home construction, it also delivered concrete to towns in Hampden and Worcester counties. Homeowners in East Longmeadow, Monson, Palmer, Ware, Wales and Hampden have reported foundation problems caused by pyrrhotite.

In September 2018, a packed meeting of homeowners in Monson attended a forum on crumbling foundations. According to news reports of the meeting, some of the attendees had already spent tens of thousands of dollars trying to remedy crumbling foundations from pyrrhotite laced concrete from the Willington quarry. The driving distance between the Willington quarry and Monson is less than fifteen miles.

The state senators and representative who attended the Monson forum had worked to pass a budget amendment in the summer to set up a commission to study the issue and to appropriate state money to reimburse homeowners for the cost of testing their foundations for pyrrhotite.

Connecticut has set up a not-for-profit captive insurer for crumbling foundations

Jacking a house to replace crumbling foundation cracked by pyrrhotite —Photo courtesy of Connecticut Congressman Joseph Courtney

The Connecticut Department of Housing has characterized the pyrrhotite foundation problem as “a slow-moving natural disaster” affecting forty-one towns in north, east, and central Connecticut. The damage is irreversible, and the most effective repair is to replace the existing foundation with a new one that does not contain pyrrhotite. The department reports the current estimates to replace these foundations range between $150,000 and $250,000 per home.

In October 2015, the Connecticut insurance department prohibited insurers from non-renewing or canceling homeowner policies because of the insured property having a crumbling pyro

In 2017, Connecticut established the Crumbling Foundation Assistance Fund. This fund is a not-for-profit captive insurer incorporated as the Connecticut Foundation Solutions Indemnity Company, LLC (CFSIC). The fund will become operational on January 10, 2019.

This captive insurer’s funding comes from:

  • $100 million in state bonding ($20 million/year for the next five years);
  • approximately $9 million annually for ten years through a $12 annual surcharge on homeowner’s insurance policies.

Once operational, the CFSIC will provide funding for foundation replacement to those Connecticut residents who qualify. It is generally recognized that based on the foundation replacement cost and the number of potential claimants, CFSIC’s funding is woefully inadequate.

For this reason, Travelers created the Travelers Benefit Program to provide additional financial support for its customers. Beginning Feb. 15, 2019, eligible Travelers customers whose repair costs exceed the benefit provided by the CFSIC will be able to enroll in the Travelers Benefit Program. The program will provide current customers up to $25,000 and former customers up to $10,000, subject to program terms.

Will Massachusetts insurers see successful crumbling foundation claims?

While the bulk of the pyrrhotite foundation problem has emerged in Connecticut, recognition of the problem is growing in the Western Massachusetts towns near the border with Connecticut.

As some Massachusetts homeowners have their major asset collapse under them, they will look to their insurance policies and its coverage for “collapse.”

In the cases going before the Connecticut Supreme Court, the question is:

What constitutes a ‘substantial impairment of structural integrity’ for purposes of applying the ‘collapse’ provision of this homeowners’ insurance policy?”

This question arises because in an earlier case, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that the term “collapse” in a homeowner insurance policy, when otherwise undefined, was “sufficiently ambiguous to include coverage for any substantial impairment of the structural integrity of a building.”

While Agency Checklists recently wrote about a case where an insured put forth a similar argument regarding avoiding damage to the insured property. See Agency Checklists’ article of May 8, 2018, “No Coverage For Roche Bros. Who Spent $800,000 In Snow Removal Prevention. Massachusetts law is not as liberal as some other states in construing the word “collapse” in homeowner policies.

In a decision where the insured urged the Appeals Court to find the term “collapse” ambiguous and to cover the “substantial impairment of the structural integrity of a building” the Court specifically ruled against the insured stating, “There are no degrees of collapse. The policy does not cover ‘imminent’ collapse, as [the insured] argues; it only covers the collapse.”

Based on this legal precedent, there seems little likelihood of any coverage applying under a Massachusetts homeowner policy for a crumbling foundation claim.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Insurers | News

About Owen Gallagher

Owen Gallagher is an experienced insurance litigator as well as a certified mediator and arbitrator who specializes in insurance industry disputes. His interest and affinity for insurance began at a young age working the counter at his father’s assigned risk agency in Roxbury. Over the course of his career, Owen has argued a number of cases in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and has helped agents, insurance companies, and lawmakers alike with the complexities and idiosyncrasies of insurance law in the Commonwealth.  Owen can be reached here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Frank A. Lombard CPCU ARM says

    December 18, 2018 at 2:47 PM

    I suggest this is not a “collapse” issue, this is damage caused by a “defective material” in the concrete. While damage to the foundation may be excluded the repair of the “ensuing” damage to the rest of the structure (which they all have) should be covered.

    In addition, the “reasonable steps” provision should cover the cost of raising the structure to enable the replacement of the defective concrete ad protect the property from further damage.

    Seems to me most of the costs these homeowners face to correct this problem should be covered by their home insurance. Why aren’t the senators and representatives at least raising these questions?

Primary Sidebar

Sponsored

Latest Agency Sales

Marsh McLennan Agency Acquires Clark Insurance, Expands Presence in New England Region

Chicopee's White Birch Insurance Acquires Connecticut Agency

Chicopee’s White Birch Insurance Acquires Connecticut Agency

Patriot Growth Adds Two Employee Benefit Agencies in Massachusetts

Cross Insurance Acquires Two More Massachusetts Insurance Agencies & Opens A New Office in Newburyport

More Agency Sales

Career News

Liberty Mutual Insurance Appoints Monica Caldas to Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Liberty Mutual Insurance Appoints Monica Caldas to Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Liberty Mutual Insurance Appoints Melanie Foley to Executive Vice President and Chief Administration Officer

Liberty Mutual Insurance Appoints Melanie Foley to Executive Vice President and Chief Administration Officer

Boston-based insurtech Hi Marley Launches Marley Insights

Hi Marley Names Jonathan Tushman as Chief Product Officer

MAPFRE USA Names Dana Whiteley as SVP Business Development

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. Elects Francisco A. Aristeguieta to Board of Directors

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. Elects Francisco A. Aristeguieta to Board of Directors

In Memoriam

In Memoriam: Martha Hinkley, 1947-2022

In Memoriam: Daniel Rizzo, 1937-2022

In Memoriam: Bruce MacDonald 1935-2022

In Memoriam: Bruce MacDonald 1935-2022

CAR News

Right to Repair Group Files Amicus Brief & Urges Prompt Ruling on Ballot Question After 1 Year Delay

3rd Look 2022: The Massachusetts Private Passenger Auto Insurance Marketplace

3rd Look 2022: The MA Commercial Auto Insurance Marketplace

17 Bullet Points on The New Insurance Labor Rate Report

View More CAR News

Massachusetts Law Updates

New Rule Would Make Insurers Pay Insured For Preventing An Insured Loss

New Rule Would Make Insurers Pay Insured For Preventing An Insured Loss

A formal request by Federal Appeals Court to the SJC to decide if insurers owe costs to prevent a covered loss.

Front view of the Quincy Mass. Masonic Temple with Roman Columns

Confused Voicemail Leads to E&O and Coverage Suits

SJC Construed For 1st Time Meaning of “Doing Business As” In Relation to CGL Coverage.

5 Points On New Ruling: Unreasonable Storage Reduces ACV Payment

A short opinion with a disproportionate impact on first-party property damage total loss claims.

Agency Checklist article on COVID-19 Closings in Massachusetts

First State High-Court COVID-19 Decision On Business Interruption Claims

Dismissed by Superior Court, the restaurants took their appeal directly to the SJC.

More Mass. Law Updates

DOI News

The 2022 Home Insurance Report Part III | Policy Numbers by Massachusetts County

The 2022 MA Home Insurance Report Part II | MA FAIR Plan Review

The 2022 MA Home Insurance Report | Part I

Mass. Business Entity License Renewals on Hold

View More DOI News

Insurance Fraud

Quinn Group Ins. Owner’s Trial to Begin on Federal Benefit and Social Security Fraud Today

First Guilty Plea in No-Fault PIP Auto Insurance Fraud Scheme

GM Financial Will Pay Over $1.8 Million For GAP Coverage Refunds and Loan Violations

Insurance Agency To Pay $100,000 Fine And $515,000 In Restitution Under Consent Decree

More Insurance Fraud News

Footer

Agency Checklists

About us
Contact us

14 Summer Street
Suite 102
Malden, MA 02148
617-598-3800

Advertise on Agency Checklists

We offer a variety of ways to get help promote your company or product.

Announcements
Email Sponsorships
Partnerships
Custom Collaborations

*Affiliate Disclosure

Please note that any of Agency Checklists’ articles might contain one or more affiliate links. This means that any subsequent purchase resulting from these links may result in a commission for us, but at no additional cost to you. For example, as an Amazon Associate, Agency Checklists earns a commission from all qualifying purchases. By working with affiliates we can continue to keep Agency Checklists subscription free. Thank you for your support.

SEARCH OUR SITE

Explore Our Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Agency Checklists · All rights reserved.

 

Loading Comments...