• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Contact Us
  • Sponsor An Email
  • Post A Job
  • Merger & Acquisition Services

Agency Checklists

Massachusetts Insurance News & Job Opportunities

You are here: Home / Insurance News | Massachusetts / DOI News | Massachusetts Division of Insurance / A Failing Mark For Massachusetts On The 2017 Insurance Regulation Report Card

A Failing Mark For Massachusetts On The 2017 Insurance Regulation Report Card

January 9, 2018 by AC Editor

An annual examination of insurance regulation by state

Unlike the banking and securities industries, the insurance marketplace continues to be one of the largest and most significant segments of the financial services industry sectors regulated almost entirely at the state level.

With that said, the R Street Institute, a non-profit, non-partisan public policy research organization, has taken on the job of examining each of the 50 states to determine which ones do the best job in regulating the “business of insurance.” Since 2012, the annual results have been published in R Street’s annual Insurance Regulation Report Card.

Now in its sixth edition, the Insurance Regulation Report Card reviews and “grades” each state, via seven different dimensions, to determine how effective and efficient each state is in the discharge of their duties with respect to insurance.

The underlying belief behind the Insurance Regulation Report Card,  is to determine which state regulatory systems best embody the principles of a limited and efficient government, embodying R Street’s own mantra of “Free Markets. Real Solutions”. R Street Senior Fellow, Editor-in-Chief and Co-Founder, R.J. Lehmann, expands on that notion in the report explaining that:

We believe states should regulate only those market activities where government is best-positioned to act; that they should do so competently and with measurable results; and that their activities should lay the minimum possible financial burden on policyholders, companies and, ultimately, taxpayers.”

Mr. Lehmann cautions, however, in this edition, as he has cautioned in past editions, the report card should not be seen as an indictment against certain states or their commissioners.:

The report is not intended as a referendum on specific regulators. Scoring an “F” does not mean that a state’s insurance commissioner is inadequate, nor is scoring an “A+” an endorsement of those who run the insurance
department. Significant changes in states’ scores most often would only be possible through action by state legislatures. Variables are weighted to provide balance between considering the rules a state adopts and the results it demonstrates, between the effectiveness of regulators in performing their core duties and the efficiency of a state in making use of its resources.

So how does the report actually give grades

The R Street Institute asks the following three basic questions in analyzing a state’s regulation of its insurance industry:

  1. How free are consumers to choose the insurance products they want?
  2. How free are insurers to provide the insurance products consumers want?
  3. How effectively are states discharging their duties to monitor insurer solvency, police fraud and consumer abuse and foster competitive, private insurance markets?

After asking these three questions, the institute then uses the most recent data available in tracking insurance regulation within seven broad categories. These include measuring

  • whether states avoid excess politicization;
  • how well they monitor insurer solvency;
  • how efficiently they spend the insurance taxes and fees they collect;
  • how competitive their home and auto insurance markets are;
  • how large their residual markets are;
  • and the degree to which they permit insurers to adjust rates and employ rating criteria as risks and market conditions demand.

Highlights from the 2017 report

The R Street noted that in 2017, the organization saw progress on one “notable measure” with regards to the competitive insurance markets. More specifically, it was pleased with the continue shrinking of residual property insurance mechanisms. While the Massachusetts residual homeowner’s marketplace was not specifically cited, our readers will note that the MA FAIR Plan has followed this trend as noted in our latest look at the Commissioner’s Annual Home Insurance Report.

In addition to ranking and evaluating the state of insurance regulation throughout the country, the report also includes state-by-state developments over the past year. With respect to Massachusetts, the institute highlighted the following insurance developments for this year’s report:

Massachusetts – Bills introduced in January, H. 554 and S.
533, would prohibit homeowners insurers from considering a
dog’s breed as part of the underwriting and rate-setting processes.
The measures were subject to hearings in October,49
but have yet to move through committee in either chamber.

In November, Gov. Charlie Baker appointed Gary Anderson
to become commissioner of the commonwealth’s Division
of Insurance.50 Anderson had been serving as interim commissioner
since February, when former Insurance Commissioner
Daniel Judson stepped down to become president of
the Workers’ Compensation Rating and Inspection Bureau
of Massachusetts.

Now more on Massachusetts’ marks this year…

While our neighbor to the North, Vermont, once again received top marks in 2017, as it did in 2016 as well, Massachusetts’ mark in 2017 is actually worse than its grade in 2016. This marks a three year downward trend, as 2016 was also a worse grade than the  “C” the Commonwealth got in 2015.

To recap: In 2013, the Commonwealth received a “C-“, then dropped to a “D” in 2014, but rallied in 2015, when the Bay State’s grade improved to a solid “C”. The improvement was short-lived, however, as Massachusetts barely earned a passing grade in 2016 with a “D-“. This year, it officially failed, with an “F” for 2017.

The following capsule report explains the report’s reasoning why the Commonwealth “failed” this year.

Agency Checklists, MA Division of Insurance, MA Insurance News, Mass. Insurance News

While R Street cited the state’s competitive home insurance market as a strength, the Commonwealth ultimately was marked down for various factors including a large regulatory surplus, large residual auto and homeowners markets, as well as what the R Street perceives as little underwriting freedom.

More about the R Street’s Massachusetts Grade

As anyone who has gone to school would agree, it is sometimes hard to know why you are given a certain grade. Oftentimes, the best way to improve is often to ask why you were graded the way you were.

To that end, we queried Mr. Lehmann on his views as to why Massachusetts garnered such a low grade for its overall performance. Here is what he wrote us:

Massachusetts once again ranked among the bottom few states in our survey. The state has fairly restrictive underwriting rules, banning the use of credit and proscribing considerations of age and gender. The state has large relatively residual markets in both home and auto.

The auto residual market, though it is still the third-largest in the country, has shrunk enormously since deregulation a decade ago, which is a major bright spot. But the place where the commonwealth continues to be most unusual is in what we call “regulatory surplus” – the proportion by which the regulatory fees and assessments it collects exceed what it spends on regulating insurance.

Massachusetts collected $127.5 million in regulatory fees and assessments in 2016, but spent only $14.7 million on insurance regulation. This is by far the largest spread in the country, and it represents a kind of hidden tax that insurance consumers must bear. “

The Top 10 best states for insurance regulation according to R Street

In addition to learning about Massachusetts, Agency Checklists still thought our readers would be interested in knowing what states were ranked as the “top” students this year. Here are the ten states this year that R Street says are doing it right:

  • Vermont  “A+”

  • Arizona  “A”

  • Idaho  “A”

  • Utah  “A”

  • Nevada “A”

  • Wisconsin “A-“

  • Maine “B+”

  • Illinois “B+”

  • Kentucky “B+”

  • Oregon “B+”

And now the top ten who make up the other end of the list…

On the other end of the list, these ten states were given the lowest marks for their regulation of insurance in addition to the Commonwealth. While Massachusetts is not the worst, it’s close.

  • Minnesota “D”

  • New York “D”

  • Hawaii “D”

  • Montana “D”

  • Arkansas “D”

  • California “D”

  • Massachusetts “F”

  • Louisiana “F”

  • North Carolina “F”

  • Delaware “F”

For those interested in taking a look at the official report, a copy can be accessed by clicking the link below:

View the R Street’s 2017 Insurance Regulation Report Card here

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: DOI News | Massachusetts Division of Insurance Tagged With: DOI news, MA DOI news, mass insurance news, Mass. Insurance News

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jane Logan says

    January 18, 2018 at 8:41 AM

    The MA DOI deserves a failing grade. Just one example why is MPIUA just submitted a filing to change the Wind deductible and increase rates. The filing may not require a hearing. Even though the DOI provided me a copy of filings in the past, in order to get a copy of this filing I have to file a Freedom of Information Act request for them to determine if they may release a copy of this filing. I’ve advocated for consumers with the DOI since 1996, since 2004 on the coastal insurance crisis and the DOI has an astounding record of not protecting consumers. The DOI has one job, to regulate rates so they’re adequate, not excessive or unfairly discriminatory and they just don’t do the job.

  2. Jane Logan says

    January 28, 2018 at 2:56 PM

    The MA DOI hearing on the MPIUA filing for Named Storm Deductible, Forms and Rules changes (Docket No. R2017-02) will be held 2/23/18 at 10:00 a..m. The last time the MPIUA had a “rule change” hearing they increased the wind deductible from 1% to 2% in coastal areas and from 2% to 5% on the islands. A rule change hearing sounds harmless enough, however based on my experience rule changes in the past have had a huge negative impact on consumers. We could use more agents being involved with the regulatory process, please consider attending the hearing. There’s a process to sign up to speak and deadlines this is the link: https://www.mass.gov/service-details/division-of-insurance-public-hearings-2018

Primary Sidebar

Sponsored

Latest Agency Sales

Marsh McLennan Agency Acquires Clark Insurance, Expands Presence in New England Region

Chicopee's White Birch Insurance Acquires Connecticut Agency

Chicopee’s White Birch Insurance Acquires Connecticut Agency

Patriot Growth Adds Two Employee Benefit Agencies in Massachusetts

Cross Insurance Acquires Two More Massachusetts Insurance Agencies & Opens A New Office in Newburyport

More Agency Sales

Career News

Liberty Mutual Insurance Appoints Monica Caldas to Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Liberty Mutual Insurance Appoints Monica Caldas to Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Liberty Mutual Insurance Appoints Melanie Foley to Executive Vice President and Chief Administration Officer

Liberty Mutual Insurance Appoints Melanie Foley to Executive Vice President and Chief Administration Officer

Boston-based insurtech Hi Marley Launches Marley Insights

Hi Marley Names Jonathan Tushman as Chief Product Officer

MAPFRE USA Names Dana Whiteley as SVP Business Development

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. Elects Francisco A. Aristeguieta to Board of Directors

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. Elects Francisco A. Aristeguieta to Board of Directors

In Memoriam

In Memoriam: Martha Hinkley, 1947-2022

In Memoriam: Daniel Rizzo, 1937-2022

In Memoriam: Bruce MacDonald 1935-2022

In Memoriam: Bruce MacDonald 1935-2022

CAR News

Right to Repair Group Files Amicus Brief & Urges Prompt Ruling on Ballot Question After 1 Year Delay

3rd Look 2022: The Massachusetts Private Passenger Auto Insurance Marketplace

3rd Look 2022: The MA Commercial Auto Insurance Marketplace

17 Bullet Points on The New Insurance Labor Rate Report

View More CAR News

Massachusetts Law Updates

New Rule Would Make Insurers Pay Insured For Preventing An Insured Loss

New Rule Would Make Insurers Pay Insured For Preventing An Insured Loss

A formal request by Federal Appeals Court to the SJC to decide if insurers owe costs to prevent a covered loss.

Front view of the Quincy Mass. Masonic Temple with Roman Columns

Confused Voicemail Leads to E&O and Coverage Suits

SJC Construed For 1st Time Meaning of “Doing Business As” In Relation to CGL Coverage.

5 Points On New Ruling: Unreasonable Storage Reduces ACV Payment

A short opinion with a disproportionate impact on first-party property damage total loss claims.

Agency Checklist article on COVID-19 Closings in Massachusetts

First State High-Court COVID-19 Decision On Business Interruption Claims

Dismissed by Superior Court, the restaurants took their appeal directly to the SJC.

More Mass. Law Updates

DOI News

The 2022 Home Insurance Report Part III | Policy Numbers by Massachusetts County

The 2022 MA Home Insurance Report Part II | MA FAIR Plan Review

The 2022 MA Home Insurance Report | Part I

Mass. Business Entity License Renewals on Hold

View More DOI News

Insurance Fraud

Quinn Group Ins. Owner’s Trial to Begin on Federal Benefit and Social Security Fraud Today

First Guilty Plea in No-Fault PIP Auto Insurance Fraud Scheme

GM Financial Will Pay Over $1.8 Million For GAP Coverage Refunds and Loan Violations

Insurance Agency To Pay $100,000 Fine And $515,000 In Restitution Under Consent Decree

More Insurance Fraud News

Footer

Agency Checklists

About us
Contact us

14 Summer Street
Suite 102
Malden, MA 02148
617-598-3800

Advertise on Agency Checklists

We offer a variety of ways to get help promote your company or product.

Announcements
Email Sponsorships
Partnerships
Custom Collaborations

*Affiliate Disclosure

Please note that any of Agency Checklists’ articles might contain one or more affiliate links. This means that any subsequent purchase resulting from these links may result in a commission for us, but at no additional cost to you. For example, as an Amazon Associate, Agency Checklists earns a commission from all qualifying purchases. By working with affiliates we can continue to keep Agency Checklists subscription free. Thank you for your support.

SEARCH OUR SITE

Explore Our Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Agency Checklists · All rights reserved.

 

Loading Comments...