• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Sign Up
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
    • Monthly Banner Ad
    • Sponsor An Email
    • Post A Job
    • Product Launch

Agency Checklists

Massachusetts-inspired Insurance News & More

  • JOBS
  • Checklists
    • Starting Your Own Massachusetts Insurance Agency
    • Purchasing An Insurance Agency in Massachusetts
    • Why, When, & How: Times When A Massachusetts Insurance Agent Should Use A Business Broker
    • Deciding Whether or Not to Outsource Your Customer Service?
    • Employment Contracts & The Non-Compete Clause In Massachusetts
    • Hiring An Insurance Producer In Massachusetts
    • Insurance Agent to Agency Loans In Massachusetts
    • Moving Your Massachusetts Insurance Agency
    • How Premium Financing Can Work For Your Massachusetts Insurance Agency
    • Remuneration Audit Checklist
    • Selling Your Massachusetts Insurance Agency
    • Applying For An Agency Loan
    • When The Auditor Calls
  • Data
  • Events
  • InsurShop
    • Insurance Quiz Time
    • Insurance Books
      • Innovation Titles
      • Improvement
      • Leadership
      • Licensing
      • Marketing
      • Sales
    • Insurance Films
    • Insurance Glossary
  • Partner News
You are here: Home / Insurance Insights | Massachusetts / InsurOp-Eds / Should Agents Advocate For Insureds In Claim Denials?

Should Agents Advocate For Insureds In Claim Denials?

August 4, 2020 by Bill Wilson

An InsurOp-Ed on the value-added sales proposition of having an agent advocate at claim time


For over 30 years, I’ve assisted independent insurance agents in advocating for insureds at claim time when they are convinced that a claim has been wrongfully denied. When I speak and write about the virtue and value of independent insurance agents, I usually cite three bases for the independent agent advantage: (1) trust, (2) choice, and (3) advocacy.

Perhaps I’ll write about the first two in another article, but today I focus on the value-added sales proposition of having an advocate at claim time. Consumers and business owners that buy insurance directly from the carrier have no one to advocate on their behalf if there is a problem with a claim unless they want, and are able, to involve a public adjuster or attorney.

What prompted this article is a webinar I attended recently where agents were cautioned, perhaps in some ways discouraged, from intervening in claims. Certainly, there is a right way and a wrong way to advocate, but IF there is a reasonable and just basis for overturning a claim denial, competent and smart agents will make that attempt. If they know what they’re doing, they’re usually successful. Over the years, I’ve assisted agents literally tens of thousands of times in accomplishing just that.

The cautionary issue is the E&O exposure, but my contention is that the vast majority of E&O claims arise from denied claims, especially those that are improperly denied. Paid claims rarely result in E&O claims. In addition, an agent that works diligently to get an initial claim denial reversed greatly increases account retention and referrals. For example, the following is an advertisement an insured took out in a local newspaper lauding the work of their insurance agent:

Source: Bill Wilson, Insurance Commentary

Imagine the free PR this brought to that agency throughout the community. While claim denial reversals don’t always result in this kind of publicity, they often can generate testimonials and referrals.


(Warning: Shameless Plug Coming….)

To assist in this process, I wrote a book entitled “When Words Collide: Resolving Insurance Coverage and Claims Disputes.” It’s based on my 30+ years in getting denied claims reversed. In the book, I share the principles and practices I’ve successfully employed to accomplish this. These are proven techniques I’ve used thousands of times.

For those of you who have the book and found it useful, I would appreciate a brief Amazon review. If you can spare a few minutes, click here to do a review. Thanks.

Review When Words Collide on Amazon

Leave a Review

According to Wilson v. 21st Century Ins. Co. (2007) 42 Cal.4th 713, 720, 723:

“While an insurance company has no obligation under the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing to pay every claim its insured makes, the insurer cannot deny the claim ‘without fully investigating the grounds for its denial.’ . . . By the same token, denial of a claim on a basis unfounded in the facts known to the insurer, or contradicted by those facts, may be deemed unreasonable. ‘A trier of fact may find that an insurer acted unreasonably if the insurer ignores evidence available to it which supports the claim. The insurer may not just focus on those facts which justify denial of the claim.’”

So, how is the insurer exposed to evidence which supports coverage? That’s the role of an advocating agent. In Smith v. Travelers Indem. Co., 32 Cal. App. 3d 1010, 1017, 108 Cal. Rptr. 643 (Ct. App. 5th Dist. 1973), the court said, “An insurer bears a duty to defend its insured whenever it ascertains facts which give rise to the potential of liability under the policy irrespective of the source of the information.”

What are those sources of information? One is the book itself. A policyholder attorney blogged that he used the book as a tool to obtain a $5M judgment. The book also references other resources, especially the ready availability and use of case law. An insurer cannot ignore or conceal its knowledge of case law that supports coverage. For example:

“In situations where a layman might give the controlling language of the policy a more restrictive interpretation than the insurer knows the courts have given it and, as a result, the uninformed insured might be inclined to be quiescent about the disregard or non-payment of his claim and not to press it in timely fashion, the company cannot ignore its obligation. It cannot hide behind the insured’s ignorance of the law; it cannot conceal its liability. In these circumstances, it has the duty to speak and disclose, and to act in accordance with its contractual undertaking.” — Bowler v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 53 N.J. 313, 327-328, 250 A.2d 580, 588 (1969)

Do you advocate for your customers at claim time if you believe a claim has been improperly denied? If not, you are likely to lose a valuable opportunity to retain a customer and generate testimonials and referrals.


Agency Checklists, MA Insurance News, Mass. Insurance News, Bill Wilson, Insurance Commentary

Bill Wilson

William C. Wilson, Jr., CPCU, ARM, AIM, AAM is the founder of InsuranceCommentary.com. He retired from the Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America in December 2016 where he served as Assoc. VP of Education and Research and was the founder and director of the Big “I” Virtual University for over 17 years.

He is the former Director of Education & Technical Affairs for the Insurers of Tennessee and, prior to that time, he was employed by Insurance Services Office, Inc.  He is a graduate of the Illinois Institute of Technology with a B.S. degree in Fire Protection & Safety Engineering.

Copyright 2016-2018 by InsuranceCommentary.com. Reprinted with permission.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    Filed Under: InsurOp-Eds

    Reader Interactions

    Comments

    1. Joan Kavanagh says

      August 4, 2020 at 10:37 AM

      Your article made me recall a recent incident where I intended to fight for the insured but it resolved in the meantime. Huge tree feel on client’s truck. Client had Comprehensive coverage with $500 Deductible. Company refused to pay for removal of the tree! I demanded to know where the exclusion was in Comprehensive that said removal coverage (from falling objects) was not covered. Up the ladder it went, all said it was not covered, that’s it! In the meantime, I cited a tornado, years ago, where this same company paid hundreds of comp claims with removal coverage – I was told this was the kindness & generosity of their heart. It was a catastrophe… I was just incensed. Owner of tree said Act of God (windstorm) and he was not paying either. Good news is, insured got a chain saw & friends and managed to get the truck out from under the tree. In the future, do you think removal should be covered? Should I get the company to commit now anyway?

    2. Bill Wilson says

      August 4, 2020 at 4:28 PM

      It’s part of the cost to repair unless the carrier wants to pay a mechanic and body shop to do the work at the scene of the accident. If you’re involved in a collision and your car has to be towed to the repair shop, that expense is part of the cost to repair. Same here. If this occurred at his home, there might also be coverage under the HO policy.

    Primary Sidebar

    Latest Agency Sales

    Salem Five Insurance VP Andrew Drayer

    A Q&A With Andrew Drayer: Salem Five Insurance’s New Senior VP For Agency Acquisitions And Strategic Growth

    Agency Sales in Massachusetts | 2020

    Insurance Agency Mergers & Acquisitions in Massachusetts | 2020

    Defying All Expectations 2020 Ends Up Being A Boom For Insurance Agency Mergers & Acquisitions

    Duffy Insurance Announces 10th Acquisition With Purchase Of The Barry & O’Connor Agency

    More Agency Sales

    2020 NAIC Market Share Reports

    NAIC 2020 Market Share Reports

    Comments & Updates

    • Tony Lucacio on Associate General Counsel For Goosehead Insurance Terminated After Participating In January 6th Events In Washington, D.C.
    • Annie on Vermont Mutual Distributes $1,000,000 to COVID-19 Relief Efforts
    • Andrew J. Carpentier on The CAR Year In Review: Highlights From The 2020 Annual Report
    • Frank Lombard CPCU ARM on Time To Act As A Trusted Advisor About Earthquake Insurance?
    • Mike Ryan on InsurOp-Ed: Biden Tax Plan’s Impact on Insurance Agencies

    AC In Your Inbox

    Massachusetts Law Updates

    Insurance Coverage lawsuits Massachusetts

    First Circuit Holds Total Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply Where An Endorsement May Provide Separate Grant Of Coverage

    An insurance coverage lawsuit in Massachusetts confirming the importance of reading an insurance policy as a whole versus in parts.

    Raynham Agent’s Non-Compete Escape Clause Included In Agency Sale Still Valid After Subsequent Stock Sale

    A case deciding whether a non-compete clause included by the former owner of Eagle Insurance in his sale to People’s United Insurance, is still valid after that agency’s subsequent sale to AssuredPartners.

    Boston Red Sox And MLB Aim Legal Beanball At Insurers With Billion-Dollar Lawsuit

    Boston Red Sox and MLB Aim Legal Beanball At Insurers With Billion-Dollar Lawsuit

    30 Major League Baseball teams have filed suit against their 3 insurers seeking $1.6 billion in Business Interruption losses from the COVID-19 shutdowns.

    Should Insurance Agents Help Advocate Claims?

    Court Rules An Obscure Statute Cured Contract Breach For A Three-Year Delay In Undisputed Claim Payment

    A discussion of a recent Appellate Division of the District Court ruling a little-used statute can protect an insurance entity from a breach of contract for the payment of money.

    More Mass. Law Updates

    CAR News

    The CAR Year In Review: Highlights From The 2020 Annual Report

    Last Look 2020: The Private Passenger Auto Insurance Marketplace in Massachusetts

    Last Look 2020: The Commercial Auto Insurance Market Share in Massachusetts

    CAR Begins The RFP Process For Commercial Servicing Carriers And Possible Commercial Pool Changes

    View More CAR News

    DOI News

    Massachusetts Moves Up In 2020 Insurance Regulation Report Card

    Mass. Division of Insurance Issues Four COVID-19-Related Bulletins Before 2021

    Massachusetts Stays The Course As The 12th Largest Insurance Marketplace

    DOI Announces Hearings For Two Separate Insurance Company Acquisitions of Control

    View More DOI News

    Insurance Fraud

    Peabody Contractor Indicted For Insurance Fraud And Payroll Tax Evasion On $2.5 Million Of Under-The-Table Wages

    Massachusetts Shares in $39.5 Million Multistate Settlement Agreement Over Insurance Company Data Breach

    Arthur J. Gallagher Suffers Ransomware Attack

    MA Attorney General Sues Keches Law Firm For Referring Injured Workers On Comp To A Mail-Order Pharmacy For Kickbacks

    More Insurance Fraud News

    Footer

    Agency Checklists

    About us
    Contact us

    14 Summer Street
    Suite 102
    Malden, MA 02148
    617-598-3800
    info@agencychecklists.com

    Advertise on Agency Checklists

    We offer a variety of ways to get help promote your company or product.

    Announcements
    Email Sponsorships
    Partnerships
    Custom Collaborations

    *Affiliate Disclosure

    Please note that any of Agency Checklists’ articles might contain one or more affiliate links. This means that any subsequent purchase resulting from these links may result in a commission for us, but at no additional cost to you. For example, as an Amazon Associate, Agency Checklists earns a commission from all qualifying purchases. By working with affiliates we can continue to keep Agency Checklists subscription free. Thank you for your support.

    SEARCH OUR SITE

    Explore Our Archives

    Copyright © 2021 · Agency Checklists · All rights reserved.