Insurer obligation to defend insured against covered/sometimes potentially covered suits.
Related Articles:
- Patriots’ Owner Sues Hiscox for Coverage on Social Media Infringement ClaimsCoverage case involves notices of alleged infringements by Patriots regarding social media music use.
- MA Appeals Court Reverses $7 Million Telephone Consumer Protection Act Judgment Against Peerless Insurance’s SubsidiariesThe insurers appealed to the Appeals Court, which ended up reversing the judgment.
- InSurOp-Ed: In Claim Disputes, Disregard Case Law At Your Own RiskMr. Wilson's latest post on the principle he refers to as “Unconscionable Advantage.”
- New Rule Would Make Insurers Pay Insured For Preventing An Insured LossA formal request by Federal Appeals Court to the SJC to decide if insurers owe costs to prevent a covered loss.
- Court Rules Liability Insurer Can Recover Defense Costs & $1.5 Million Settlement from InsuredIn a case of first impression, an insured must reimburse its insurer for defense and settlement costs on an uncovered claim.
- Understanding The Duty to Defend: Partington Builders v. Nautilus Ins.Federal Court Reaffirms Massachusetts Rule Regarding an Insurer's Duty to Defend
- The JMA v. Zurich Appeals Court Ruling: A Warning Against Insurers’ Delayed Payment of Insureds’ Legal Fees”Appeals Case Revisits Underlying Lawsuit Involving Zurich Insurance Duty to Defend Dispute.
- SJC Pinpointing Parameters of The ‘Physical Abuse’ Homeowner’s Policy Exclusion in New DecisionIssues Second Opinion in Three Years Regarding The 'Physical Abuse' Policy Exclusion in Homeowners Liability Coverage
- Mass. Appeals Court Reaffirms Rigid No-Prejudice Notice Rule for Claims-Made PoliciesIn this case, the Appeals Court was asked to rule that the addition of the language, “as soon as practicable, allowing an insured to notify the insurer about facts and circumstances that might reasonably develop into a future reportable claim" allowed for late notice.
- Appeals Court Reins in Superior Court’s Expansion of Risk ManagementCourt Limits Indemnity Agreements Interpretation and Reverses $237K Legal Fee Award
