Chapter 93A of the Massachusetts General Laws makes unlawful any “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.” Under this statute, individuals and businesses can sue for actual damages as well as double or treble damages along with attorney fees.
Related Articles:
- SJC Reverses $215,000 Attorney Fee Award Found Payable Under BOP PolicyCase Highlights Risk of Uncovered Risk Product Liability Claims Brought Under G.L. c. 93A
- MA Court Dismisses Lender’s Claim Auto Insurer’s Total Loss Calculations Violated DOI RegulationSource One Financial Corporation sued GEICO seeking a declaratory judgment that GEICO’s valuations resulting from reports compiled by Certified Collateral Corporation (“CCC”) did not comply with the DOI’s regulation.
- Federal Judge’s Ruling Finds “Cheers” Bar at The Hampshire House Has No CoverageThe latest decision in Massachusetts involving a COVID-19 business interruption claim, brings no 'cheer' to Hampshire House.
- Supreme Court Rules Auto Policies Cover Vehicles’ Post-Repair Losses of ValueThe SJC has issued a widely anticipated decision initiating a sea change in the property damage recoverable under the standard Massachusetts automobile policy for all insurers within the Commonwealth.
- MA Court Rules Against Insured’s Claim Its Broker Post-Loss Agreed with Insurer to Reduce CoverageForbesGallagher's Owen Gallagher analyzes a recent Superior Court case decision involving an unusual E&O claim.
- Vermont Mutual Asks High Court to Reverse Decision $215,000 Attorney Fee Award Payable As Damages under Bodily Injury CoverageAn unusual case involving a breach of warranty claim under Chapter 93A and whether mandatory attorney fee awards apply.
- $15 Million High-Value Homeowner Policy Loss Leads Court to Rule PURE’s Reference Provision AmbiguousAn insurance coverage dispute involving the total fire loss in December 2020 of a 1905 hunting lodge built by hand with unique wood and stonework and insured for over $5 million and its contents for $2.2 million.
- Appeals Court Decision Reopens Door To Lawsuit Against New Bedford-Based Insurance AgencyA New Bedford-based agency may end up having to face a lawsuit it thought it might have avoided.
- Coverage for Inherent Diminished Value Dependent on Policy VersionA case involving an third-party auto insurance coverage claim for inherent diminished value against Amica over a damaged Acura.
- Daughter Denied $142,000 Loss Under Dad’s Gloucester Homeowner’s Policy Because Not A “Household Member” Per Policy TermsThe Massachusetts Appeals Court denied coverage for a $142,000 personal property claim arising out of a 2015 fire loss where the named insured’s daughter lived on the insured property, but did not qualify as an insured because she was not a household member.
